Generated by Pacioli version 45d7c8c (updated 2 years, 8 months ago). Analysis at 2026-01-11T15:30:15+0000 for myAUDTaddress. Return to MAIN PAGE |

Type | Defined | Bound | Derived | OK | Fail
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
formula | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0

#### Derivation Rules

# | Type | Name |  | Rule Expression
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
1 | formula | FAC_IMPUTE_IS_DER_25 Added derived:2 |  | if ProfitLossBeforeFinanceCostsOrTaxExpense eq null and exists(ProfitLossFromContinuingOperationsBeforeTax)and exists(FinanceCostsIncome)then ProfitLossFromContinuingOperationsBeforeTax+FinanceCostsIncome else null derives fac:ProfitLossBeforeFinanceCostsOrTaxExpense 2 instances: if fac:ProfitLossBeforeFinanceCostsOrTaxExpense[0] eq null and exists fac:ProfitLossFromContinuingOperationsBeforeTax[42,184,000] and exists fac:FinanceCostsIncome[6,735,000] then fac:ProfitLossFromContinuingOperationsBeforeTax[42,184,000] + fac:FinanceCostsIncome[6,735,000] else null derived fac:ProfitLossBeforeFinanceCostsOrTaxExpense[48,919,000] if fac:ProfitLossBeforeFinanceCostsOrTaxExpense[0] eq null and exists fac:ProfitLossFromContinuingOperationsBeforeTax[54,239,000] and exists fac:FinanceCostsIncome[6,649,000] then fac:ProfitLossFromContinuingOperationsBeforeTax[54,239,000] + fac:FinanceCostsIncome[6,649,000] else null derived fac:ProfitLossBeforeFinanceCostsOrTaxExpense[60,888,000]

The colours used for the rules are significant, and have the following meanings:

- When all intervening facts have been checked by consistency rules these are are in green
- Rules with inconsistent facts in red
- Rules that were not evaluated, because they had no facts to bind, in yellow
- Derivation rules (if any) that have derived (imputed) facts which have not been checked are in blue

For more information: http://accounting.auditchain.finance/index.html
DISCLAIMER: this analysis is provided by software still under development, and likely incomplete or even erroneous; do NOT use it other than for experimental, inconsequential purposes